|
Well, out of bordome, I decided to watch Cpac and for some fucked reason this was being discussed(shows how much I follow politics, apparently in been on the news a for weeks, about it taking place today). The vote was 132 Yes 136/137 No. Figured some of yahs may want to know cause some on the board do have alternitive lifestyles. This vote was for the Alliance party(the oppisition party to the liberals) defination of marriage man and woman, dont know much since I can care less about the alliance(greedy fuckers) and politics. But it goes to show how split paraliment really is on the issue, apparently next year the new definition will get vote. It's an election year in canada right now, MPs dont want this on there backs.
|